W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Mari Carmen Suárez de Figueroa Baonza <mcsuarez@fi.upm.es>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 19:32:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC82533.2080605@fi.upm.es>
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Dear all,

     here you can find some comments on the draft CR version.

- Abstract and Introduction:
     - Use one of the following 'the term "ontology"' or 'the term 
"Ontology"'

- Terminology section:
     - Ontology definition: the following sentence "its machine-readable 
format is specified in the following section 
<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-owl>." 
should include the exact section number (which is Section 7.3).
     - Ontology definition: 'section 5' --> 'Section 5'

- Section 5.1.1: last paragraph on this section is an example, what 
should be explicit (e.g., For example "contributor ....").

- Section 5.1.3.1: it seems there is no sense on giving an identifier to 
the examples in the table. Tthe identifiers example 1, example 2, etc. 
could be deleted similar to table in Section 5.1.3.2.

- Section 5.2.2: the tables do not include values in the 'relation' 
column for all the properties.

- General:
     - As name for the ontology sometimes is used "Ontology for Media 
Resources" and other times "Media Ontology". It should be clarify if 
both are synonims; or it should be used just one name along the document.
     - To refer sections in the document different ways are used (e.g., 
section, section x, section x + name). To be homogeneous we should 
select one way (e.g., Section X) and use such a way along the document.

Best Regards,

         Mari Carmen.

El 09/05/2011 16:33, Bailer, Werner escribió:
> Dear Thierry, all,
>
> Here are some comments on the draft CR version.
>
> - status section
>    - typo: convinience ->  convenience
>
> - introduction:
>    - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and "related"
>    - "with the Dublin Core" ->  "with Dublin Core"
>    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
>
> - property definitions
>    - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even listing the properties?
>    - title: double quotation mark after String
>    - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify coordinate systems by URIs)
>
> - mapping tables
>    - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>    - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
>    - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
>    - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>    - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from the number of parallel tracks being described"
>    - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
>    - F4V: "usually exact" is used
>
> - examples
>    - there is<span><tt>  markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5
>
> - ontology
>    - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL representation
>
> - references
>    - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the normative ones?
>    - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
>    - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped formats are
>
> Best regards,
> Werner
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>
>> MAWG Participants,
>>
>>
>> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media Resources
>> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
>>
>> Please have a deep review of this document.
>>
>>
>> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
>> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
>> tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
>>
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>> nt-1.0.html
>
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------
  Dr. Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa
  Teaching Assistant

  Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

  Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
  Facultad de Informática
  Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  Campus de Montegancedo, s/n
  Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid

  Phone: (+34) 91 336 36 72
  Fax: (+34) 91 352 48 19
  e-mail: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
  Office: 3205			
----------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 17:14:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 May 2011 17:14:28 GMT