W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2008

RE: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of interlinked datasets

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:55 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852017108F7@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Olaf Hartig" <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Cc: "Keith Alexander" <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>


Thanks! Got it now ;)

Would you mind adding this as a proposal to the Wiki [1], please?



 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Olaf Hartig [mailto:hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de] 
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:58 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: Keith Alexander; public-lod@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of 
>interlinked datasets
>On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:40:12 Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>> [...]
>> provenance is indeed in scope (as it says it on the Wiki, 
>but too hidden, I
>> guess): 
>> ' + using scovo to attach statistics (such as number of 
>instances of a
>> certain class, etc.) and extend with dc:provenance for scovo:Item'
>> so, the basic idea IIRC is to extend scovo (which is under 
>our control
>> as well ;) to hold the provenance information.
>I was aware of this point. However, I interpreted it as 
>follows. Statistical 
>information about the dataset is represented by scovo:Item 
>instances. Those 
>statistic items will get a dc:provenance property which represents the 
>provenance of the statistic item (e.g. methods with which the 
>statistics have 
>been generated).
>I am proposing, in contrast, a possibility to represent the 
>provenance of the 
>data in the dataset.
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:22:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:15:50 UTC