W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Library of Congress Subject Headings as SKOS Linked Data

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:14:15 +0200
Message-ID: <484FCFA7.9030503@w3.org>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, public-lod@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Michael,

afaik, yes. The process has been started with IETF, not yet completed.

I added EricP to this mails' addressees, he knows better than I do.

Ivan

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Ivan,
> 
>> which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it 
>> might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per
> http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/)
> 
> Do you know if the TAG has already agreed on this issue [1]? Is the team
> submission in sync with it?
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/01/rdf-media-types
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>   
>  http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
>> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:03 PM
>> To: Richard Cyganiak
>> Cc: Ed Summers; SWD Working SWD; public-lod@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Library of Congress Subject Headings as SKOS Linked Data
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> Ed,
>>>
>>> A very cool service, and exemplary attention to detail!
>>>
>>> Of course, I still have a few suggestions! I haven't read 
>> through the 
>>> entire thread, so apologies if some of this was mentioned already.
>>>
>>> (I saw 303s being mentioned in the thread -- you are doing 
>> things the 
>>> right way, there's no need to do 303s at <sh95000541>. It is an 
>>> information resource and therefore 200 is fine. The concept is 
>>> <sh95000541#concept>, a URI that cannot be directly dereferenced via 
>>> HTTP, so you are consistent with httpRange-14, as explained 
>> in the Cool 
>>> URIs document. This is one of the nice things about hash URIs.)
>>>
>>> 1. The content-negotiated URI should send a "Vary: Accept" 
>> header. This 
>>> helps caches to deal correctly with content-negotiated resources.
>>>
>>> 2. The correct MIME type for N3 is "text/rdf+n3;charset=utf-8", not 
>>> "text/n3". (I think the spec used to recommend text/n3, but has been 
>>> changed some time ago.)
>>
>> We should also make a difference between turtle and N3. Roughly 
>> speaking, N3 is a superset of turtle; regardless of the rule 
>> features of 
>> N3, it also has some syntactic features to serialize graphs 
>> that turtle 
>> does not have. On the other hand, while most of the RDF environments 
>> today understand turtle, they may not understand N3. Ed, I am not sure 
>> which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it 
>> might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per
> http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/)
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:14:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:16 UTC