RE: Library of Congress Subject Headings as SKOS Linked Data

Ivan,

>which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it 
>might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per
http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/)

Do you know if the TAG has already agreed on this issue [1]? Is the team
submission in sync with it?

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/01/rdf-media-types

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:03 PM
>To: Richard Cyganiak
>Cc: Ed Summers; SWD Working SWD; public-lod@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Library of Congress Subject Headings as SKOS Linked Data
>
>
>
>Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> 
>> Ed,
>> 
>> A very cool service, and exemplary attention to detail!
>> 
>> Of course, I still have a few suggestions! I haven't read 
>through the 
>> entire thread, so apologies if some of this was mentioned already.
>> 
>> (I saw 303s being mentioned in the thread -- you are doing 
>things the 
>> right way, there's no need to do 303s at <sh95000541>. It is an 
>> information resource and therefore 200 is fine. The concept is 
>> <sh95000541#concept>, a URI that cannot be directly dereferenced via 
>> HTTP, so you are consistent with httpRange-14, as explained 
>in the Cool 
>> URIs document. This is one of the nice things about hash URIs.)
>> 
>> 1. The content-negotiated URI should send a "Vary: Accept" 
>header. This 
>> helps caches to deal correctly with content-negotiated resources.
>> 
>> 2. The correct MIME type for N3 is "text/rdf+n3;charset=utf-8", not 
>> "text/n3". (I think the spec used to recommend text/n3, but has been 
>> changed some time ago.)
>
>
>We should also make a difference between turtle and N3. Roughly 
>speaking, N3 is a superset of turtle; regardless of the rule 
>features of 
>N3, it also has some syntactic features to serialize graphs 
>that turtle 
>does not have. On the other hand, while most of the RDF environments 
>today understand turtle, they may not understand N3. Ed, I am not sure 
>which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it 
>might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per
http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/)
>
>Ivan
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:08:41 UTC