Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21

Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On May 21, 2009, at 09:59, Larry Masinter wrote:
> 
>> I also agree with Roy's assessment [1] that the document is named
>> incorrectly and should not be released with the current name.
> 
> 
> Titling it "HTML 5" is actually one of the relatively few resolutions 
> this group has adopted formally:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/0909.html
> 
> 95 in favor (rolling concur into this number), 3 against, 4 abstaining. 
> Those voting against proposed instead:
> 5.01
> Canonical HTML
> (x)html5
> 
> It seems that the group consensus was overwhelmingly in favor of a title 
> like "HTML 5".
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results#xname
> 
> It seems counter-productive to reopen this WG decision.

I was imprecise.  Nobody is questioning the <h1>.  What is in question 
is the <h2>.

- Sam Ruby