- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:18:03 +0300
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, public-html@w3.org
On Jun 26, 2009, at 06:42, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Does anyone agree with the inclusion of the microdata section? I agree with its inclusion. > It's certainly possible for a solution that no one likes to be the > right answer, I would be concerned with a feature that had a > constituency of 0. In particular, does anyone think microdata is > better than including no solutions to address the use cases at which > it is aimed? I do. It addresses what I think are the main problems with microformats (lack of well-defined processing model for consumers and document conformance definition for producers) and RDFa (prefix-based indirection, use of syntax that parses differently in XML and text/ html and complexity of the graph-based model and processing rules). -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 13:19:27 UTC