W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:28:47 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <op.uzipt9qo64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:24:29 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present,  
> but not "up up" and "up")?

Why could all three not be present in the same document? E.g. to make it  
clear how the breadcrumb links relate to the document.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:29:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:50 UTC