W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:28:47 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <op.uzipt9qo64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:24:29 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present,  
> but not "up up" and "up")?

Why could all three not be present in the same document? E.g. to make it  
clear how the breadcrumb links relate to the document.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:29:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT