Feedback about pubdate=""

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:38:42 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > I haven't removed pubdate="" yet. I don't know what to replace it with:
> >
> >    <article pubdate="2009-01-13">...</article>
> >
> > ...becoming:
> >
> >    <time pubdate datetime="2009-01-13">...</time>
> >
> > ...doesn't seem like a win.
> 
> The common format seems to be to have the date somewhere inline the 
> article so not having to duplicate that information seems like a win to 
> me.

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Jeremy Keith wrote:
> 
> [...further arguments along the same lines...]

Fair enough. I've removed pubdate from <article> and added it on <time> 
instead, and updated the relevant bits.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'