- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:49:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:38:42 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > I haven't removed pubdate="" yet. I don't know what to replace it with: > > > > <article pubdate="2009-01-13">...</article> > > > > ...becoming: > > > > <time pubdate datetime="2009-01-13">...</time> > > > > ...doesn't seem like a win. > > The common format seems to be to have the date somewhere inline the > article so not having to duplicate that information seems like a win to > me. On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Jeremy Keith wrote: > > [...further arguments along the same lines...] Fair enough. I've removed pubdate from <article> and added it on <time> instead, and updated the relevant bits. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 07:47:14 UTC