W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:24:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4A9B6C9D.9050700@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
>> On the other hand, the advantage you are citing is only an advantage if a
>> given resource only contains "up up up", but not also "up up" and "up". What
>> you be the point of that?
> 
> A UA that treats any number of "up"s as the same would not interpret "up" 
> as "up1", but as meaning that the referenced document was some higher- 
> level document in the hierarchy.
> ...

Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present, 
but not "up up" and "up")?

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 06:25:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT