Re: up up up, was: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard from Julian Reschke on 2009-08-31 (public-html@w3.org from August 2009)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:39:33 +0200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <4A9B8C45.6020401@gmx.de>

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:24:29 +0200, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Again, what would be the point of this case ("up up up" being present, 
>> but not "up up" and "up")?
> 
> Why could all three not be present in the same document? E.g. to make it 
> clear how the breadcrumb links relate to the document.

Correct. That's why I was asking, because my understanding was that Ian 
thinks that's an interesting use case.

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:40:16 UTC