W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element?

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:16:04 -0500
Message-ID: <47503744.1090003@us.ibm.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:02:55 +0100, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann 
> <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I think, this part of the working draft would be more convincing, if 
>> there was an element like animation (as in SMIL, SVG Tiny 1.2 or 
>> vector or however one might call it) to reference vector graphics too 
>> (optionally with server-sided
>> generation to avoid user-sided scripting) - either as an external file
>> similar to audio or video or to embed it in a mixed document XHTML+SVG
>> as a clear separation...
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-declarative.html 
> marks 2D vector graphics and animation out of scope because it is 
> already adequately addressed by SVG which can be embedded in XHTML.

For various reasons, many members of this working group (correctly, 
IMHO) believe that XHTML is a non-starter for most people.

> Embedding SVG (and MathML for instance) in HTML is an area I and others 
> have been looking into during the TPAC (and also on this mailing list, 
> on weblogs, etc.), but we don't have a good enough proposal yet or 
> implementation experience for that matter to show that it could actually 
> work.

Some prior work in this area, some may be dead ends, others may pan out:


- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 16:16:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:28 UTC