Re: Proposal: Chained Classnames

> and/or the author may have trusted our promise that class names are 
> not supposed to mean anything
Ah yes, well that is exactly why I have concerns about the inclusion of 
pre-defined class names at all.

Gervase Markham wrote:
> Jack Sleight wrote:
>> Ending underscores are fine, but do we really need a prefix or suffix 
>> at all? I may have missed some of the conversation on this, 
>
> Just a little bit :-)
>
>> but what's wrong with just "copyright"?
>
> In summary: some people think that this is a bad idea because this 
> class name (and other undecorated ones) may already be in use on the 
> web with semantics different from those which we propose to apply, 
> and/or the author may have trusted our promise that class names are 
> not supposed to mean anything.
>
> Gerv
>

-- 
Jack

Received on Thursday, 17 May 2007 11:32:32 UTC