- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:08:02 +0200
- To: Jack Sleight <jack.sleight@gmail.com>
- CC: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Charles Ying <charles.ying@gmail.com>, Maurice Carey <maurice@thymeonline.com>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Jack Sleight schrieb: > >> and/or the author may have trusted our promise that class names are >> not supposed to mean anything > Ah yes, well that is exactly why I have concerns about the inclusion of > pre-defined class names at all. That point alone (i.e. "or" but not "and") isn't a valid argument. The promise can be changed if that doesn't cause real problems. --Dao > Gervase Markham wrote: >> Jack Sleight wrote: >>> Ending underscores are fine, but do we really need a prefix or suffix >>> at all? I may have missed some of the conversation on this, >> >> Just a little bit :-) >> >>> but what's wrong with just "copyright"? >> >> In summary: some people think that this is a bad idea because this >> class name (and other undecorated ones) may already be in use on the >> web with semantics different from those which we propose to apply, >> and/or the author may have trusted our promise that class names are >> not supposed to mean anything. >> >> Gerv
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2007 13:08:07 UTC