On May 1, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > Daniel Glazman wrote: > > > > I think we miss one principle about the ubiquity of HTML. HTML is > not > > only used in web browsers. It's used in email > > In the view of many (most ?), HTML is /abused/ in e-mail. E-mail > is about the communication of information, and can invariably > best be accomplished using text/plain. Most would like to be able to put some bold or italic text in their email, or embed a picture, or include a list, without concerning themselves with the format. They don't know or care that it is HTML. I notice that you set some of your text in pseudo-italics using the slash convention: "/abused/". Why is that invariably a better way of communicating information than using real italics: "abused"? Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:17:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:50 GMT