W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Bugs organisation

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:37:40 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2kd6Tnnrw6kb9wMu-PJ=h7XE6VBre8sXBDT8SZz8YuQ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Can't we then close down the HTML.next component? It's very confusing to
have to search for HTML bugs in two different components!

Also: the maincontent spec is both an extension spec for html5 and part of
html5.1, so where should those bugs move?

Silvia.
On 15 Jan 2013 03:52, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> we currently have a bunch of different places with bugs against the HTML
> spec.
>
> Under product HTML WG, by component:
> CR HTML5 spec           8 bugs
> HTML5 spec              127 bugs
> LC1 HTML5 spec          2 bugs
> maincontent element     4 bugs
> pre-LC1 HTML5 spec      3 bugs
>
> Under product HTML.next, by component:
> default                 115 bugs
>
> That's a bit of a mess. I'd like to propose the following organisation:
>
>  HTML WG/CR HTML5 spec: all the bugs that we plan to fix inside of the CR
> (typically, typos and various kinds of must-have fixes).
>
>  HTML WG/HTML 5.1: all the bugs that we plan to fix in 5.1.
>
>  HTML.next/default: anything that we might consider for 5.2, but not now
> (at this stage, I don't expect there to be anything in there).
>
> That involves going through the above list of 259 bugs and moving them. I
> don't want to presume that existing bugs are well-categorised, except for
> HTML.next bugs which I think can be mass-moved to 5.1.
>
> Any thoughts? If no one objects, I'll go ahead and do that.
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 00:38:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 January 2013 00:38:08 GMT