W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

RE: Issue-base-param

From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:26:13 -0000
Message-ID: <86FE9B2B91ADD04095335314BE6906E8AC80FA@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>, <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Like an idiot, I seem to have sent this without the attachements :(

Attachments attached.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of McBride, Brian
> Sent: 08 December 2006 11:51
> To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Issue-base-param
> At the last telecon I took an action to prepare test cases 
> for resolving issue 
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-base-param.  At the 
> time I thought I'd do three cases.  Whilst doing it, I 
> figured two are sufficient and can be easily combined in a 
> single test case.
> I've attached an input document, xslt transform and output 
> document for consideration.  This test case would be in 
> support of a resolution of the issue that there is no 
> specific base param, i.e a resolution of the issue along the 
> following lines:
> Propose: Given that a base URI parameter is a parameter whose 
> value is the base URI of the transform source document, the 
> WG RESOLVES not to define a base URI parameter for 
> transforms, noting that triples referring to transformed 
> document, or documents named relative to the transformed 
> document can be created as illustrated in test case 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#baseURI .
> (anticipating that the test case in this message will be 
> added to list)
> #Brian

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 14:26:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT