W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

RE: Xinclude test case

From: Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:43:32 -0000
Message-ID: <DD5E887552496241BC701548837A282F0505830B@nemo.talis.local>
To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "public-grddl-wg" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

There is, perhaps, another way. GRDDL could split the transformation
relationship into two. One would indicate a transformation to be applied
to the document as-is, without any pre-processing. The other would
indicate that xincludes need to be resolved first.

There is an unbounded set of operations that could be applied to the
source document before any GRDDL transformation which complicates
matters as things stand. Xinclude is one operation, but DTD validation
is another. Do we expect every GRDDL processor to validate the source
document before application of the transform?

The very latest from Talis
read the latest news at www.talis.com/news 
listen to our podcasts www.talis.com/podcasts 
see us at these events www.talis.com/events 
join the discussion here www.talis.com/forums 
join our developer community www.talis.com/tdn 
and read our blogs www.talis.com/blogs

Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 09:43:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC