W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:06:02 +0100
Message-ID: <463095AA.40105@hpl.hp.com>
To: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org

Dear Dave

this message is to update you as to the WG response to
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003

Our current understanding is that:
- you are satisfied with the way we have addressed the whitespace comment.
- there is on-going discussion concerning the namespace document, the WG 
response to your message is:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0019
copied from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0218
- and the other comments in your message are editorial in nature.

The editor accepted the action:
http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06
ACTION: DanC to address editorial comments by Beckett in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003

If you are already satisfied with this action as a response to the 
aspects of your message other than whitespace or the namespace document, 
please respond to indicate.

If you would prefer to wait to see how the editor addresses your 
comments, that would be very understandable, and we will update you when 
the changes are made.

thank you

Jeremy Carroll


PS I am acting without explicit WG approval, to fulfil:
http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08
ACTION: JJC to see that the CR request gets to The Director
hence, there is the possibility of formal correction to this response
from the WG.




-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 12:06:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT