- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:06:02 +0100
- To: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org
Dear Dave this message is to update you as to the WG response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003 Our current understanding is that: - you are satisfied with the way we have addressed the whitespace comment. - there is on-going discussion concerning the namespace document, the WG response to your message is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0019 copied from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0218 - and the other comments in your message are editorial in nature. The editor accepted the action: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06 ACTION: DanC to address editorial comments by Beckett in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003 If you are already satisfied with this action as a response to the aspects of your message other than whitespace or the namespace document, please respond to indicate. If you would prefer to wait to see how the editor addresses your comments, that would be very understandable, and we will update you when the changes are made. thank you Jeremy Carroll PS I am acting without explicit WG approval, to fulfil: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08 ACTION: JJC to see that the CR request gets to The Director hence, there is the possibility of formal correction to this response from the WG. -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 12:06:20 UTC