Re: another GRDDL spec review

Dear Diego

thank you also for your personal review,

we also discussed this review during our meeting last night.

We decided to make changes in response to comments 1 and 3, but not in 
response to comment 2.

Specifically:
http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04
ACTION: DanC to cite "XFN" informatively

and

http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03
ACTION: DanC to s/metdata/metadata/

these changes should be made before we publish the candidate recommendation.

The (unfortunately unminuted) discussion of your comment 2, is that it 
is an editorial comment, involving more change than we can accommodate 
at this point in our process; since we already had the final documents 
ready for the CR vote which, was on the agenda of the meeting which was 
occurring while we received your comments. The actual vote was taken 27 
minutes after receiving your comment, and included the two actions above.

Please reply indicating that these changes are acceptable to you and 
adequately address your comments.

Jeremy Carroll



PS Please see also my earlier reply to the WG review, I messed up the 
address list (twice):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0021
I trust you have received this.

PPS Again, I am acting without explicit WG approval, to fulfil:
http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08
ACTION: JJC to see that the CR request gets to The Director
hence, there is the possibility of formal correction to this response 
from the WG.


-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 11:51:11 UTC