W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Comments on GRDDL W3C Working Draft 2 March 2007

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:07:26 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org
Message-Id: <1177628846.22874.253.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 13:06 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Dear Dave
> this message is to update you as to the WG response to
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003
> Our current understanding is that:
> - you are satisfied with the way we have addressed the whitespace comment.
> - there is on-going discussion concerning the namespace document, the WG 
> response to your message is:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0019
> copied from
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0218
> - and the other comments in your message are editorial in nature.
> The editor accepted the action:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06
> ACTION: DanC to address editorial comments by Beckett in 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0003
> If you are already satisfied with this action as a response to the 
> aspects of your message other than whitespace or the namespace document, 
> please respond to indicate.
> If you would prefer to wait to see how the editor addresses your 
> comments, that would be very understandable, and we will update you when 
> the changes are made.

See http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.257

Revision 1.257  2007/04/26 23:03:29  connolly
- in response to Beckett 4 Apr:

-- noted in SOTD that normative assertions are marked up
   distinctively, to clarify that the long example is informative.
   Marked "Styling versus..." appendix as informative

-- rephrased confusing sentence about associating a GRDDL
   transformation with a whole dialect

-- fixed spelling of Vocabulary

> thank you
> Jeremy Carroll
> PS I am acting without explicit WG approval, to fulfil:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/04/25-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08
> ACTION: JJC to see that the CR request gets to The Director
> hence, there is the possibility of formal correction to this response
> from the WG.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 23:07:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT