Hi EXI WG In the Built-in Element grammar definition, in the semantics for SC fragment step 6, it is mentioned that the sequence of events have to be processed according to a Fragment grammar. Here is mentions the sequence as (SD, SE(qname), content, ED). But I may also have NS, AT or directly CH events following this SC event in which case My Fragment or FragmentContent grammar has no means to process it. How this case will be handled ? Also the sequence of events should also consider NS, AT, CH events and I will have a sequence like this (SD, [NS], [AT], [CH/SE(qname)], [content], ED). regards SanthanakrishnanReceived on Friday, 1 August 2008 06:56:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 18:12:37 GMT