W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 02:31:05 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-452549512-1547001064-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
in ther case of the view alternates - its grounded in the semantics of the
IANA registry..

there wont be one uber registry - so it really is like the prefix case -
there is utility in developing some de facto standards and a registry or
catalogs can be developed



On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 11:45, Annette Greiner <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> My concern with this is that people may use the token as a unique
> identifier, but there is no registry to ensure uniqueness, and if we are to
> consider the use of whatever already existing tokens people have used for a
> thing they call a profile, uniqueness is already lost. Why include it in a
> standard then?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/453#issuecomment-452516731>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIR3YWz04h6C2legajq9b1oMOsZyK0-9ks5vBTu3gaJpZM4XMrlj>
> .
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/453#issuecomment-452549512 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 02:31:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:05 UTC