Re: New DQV editor's draft

Sure its doable. In any case the vocabulary is part of the quality framework which is also part of my phd

Cheers,
Jeremy

On 22 May 2015, at 17:11, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Some sort of pledge of persistence, pref backed by university library.
> Should include commitment not to delete terms (deprecation and
> clarification OK).
> 
> Doable?
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> On 22 May 2015, at 15:02, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On reusing DaQ: the fact that it is a project output (no matter how good
>> that project may be) does make it a little risky.
>> 
>> So, just for my information, what would be non-risky?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.

Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 19:39:46 UTC