Re: New DQV editor's draft

Some sort of pledge of persistence, pref backed by university library.
Should include commitment not to delete terms (deprecation and
clarification OK).

Doable?

Phil



> Hi Phil,
>
> On 22 May 2015, at 15:02, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>
> wrote:
>
> On reusing DaQ: the fact that it is a project output (no matter how good
> that project may be) does make it a little risky.
>
> So, just for my information, what would be non-risky?
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>


-- 

Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.

Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 15:12:05 UTC