W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > August 2014

RE: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata

From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:41:29 +0000
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39BFB6188E0@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
A lot of the issues relate to how the requirement concepts (meta-data, formats, vocabularies, license, provenance, SLA) and requirement types (open, standardised, machine-readable, interoperable, documented, available).



So I created the attached matrix to show current requirement definition (R represents the existance of requirement). I think agreeing on which of these requirements to keep/delete/add will resolve many issues.



Can you have a quick look before today’s call and we can discuss this this afternoon.



Cheers,

Deirdre



-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl]
Sent: 22 August 2014 12:38
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata



Hi,





On 8/4/14 4:49 PM, Lee, Deirdre wrote:> If we define metadata as being 'data on the web', then all of the general requirements would also apply to metadata.

> The only two metadata-specific requirements would be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataInteroperable



Depending on the recent discussions, it may be R-MetadataAvailable and R-MetadataStandardized ;-)



But if we have requirements formulated at a general MD level, could we remove the 'corresponding' ones at the specific level? At least for the requirement on Interoperable/Standardized?

I.e. if we have R-MetadataStandardized we don't need R-LicenseStandardized, because License is a kind of MD.



Best,



Antoine





>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]

> Sent: 03 June 2014 23:25

> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>

> Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata

>

> dwbp-ISSUE-29: Clarify requirements on metadata

>

> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/29


>

> Raised by: Antoine Isaac

> On product:

>

> The requirement on 'metadata' are not clear. To me license, provenance are also a form of metadata; perhaps even vocabularies: once we have spelled out these more specific levels, it's harder to figure out what remains in the general 'metadata'.

>

>

>




Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 11:42:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:16 UTC