W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [Powerbox] New draft based on further collaboration and prototyping

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:45:35 +0200
Cc: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <8723A918-AEB6-4C12-AD80-9BEDBB251655@robineko.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On Jun 2, 2010, at 10:00 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
Le mardi 01 juin 2010 à 17:06 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> Process question for Dom: do editors listed on a draft have to be
>> formally members of the WG? The companies listed already are, so my
>> understanding is that we're covered IP-wise.
> Yes, they have to:
> Section 7.8 [1] of the process document says:
>          "Every technical report published as part of the technical report  
>        development process is edited by one or more editors appointed by a  
>        Working Group Chair. [...]
>        All W3C editors [except in the TAG and the AB] MUST be participants
>        in the group responsible for the document(s) they are editing."

Thanks Dom.

Tyler: do you mind coordinating with the other editors to see if they might want to either join the WG or have their names dropped (I think it's possible to join the WG and unsub from the list)? Sorry about this but we have to stick to process to publish (it's not an issue to get the draft into CVS though).

Robin Berjon
  robineko — hired gun, higher standards
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 12:46:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:44 UTC