public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from September 2016 by author

Andy Seaborne

Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Monday, 12 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Friday, 9 September)
Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (Thursday, 8 September)

Arnaud Le Hors

Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Thursday, 29 September)
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 27 September 2016 (Tuesday, 27 September)
RDF Data Shapes agenda for Tuesday 27 September 2016 (Monday, 26 September)
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 September 2016 (Thursday, 22 September)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 September 2016 (Tuesday, 20 September)
Re: Weekly call schedule (Friday, 16 September)
Re: Weekly call schedule (Wednesday, 14 September)
RDF Data Shapes agenda for 14 September 2016 (Wednesday, 14 September)
Weekly call schedule (Tuesday, 13 September)
Re: SHACL Full (Monday, 12 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Monday, 12 September)
RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 8 September 2016 (Friday, 9 September)
Re: Meeting times (was: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016) (Thursday, 8 September)
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016 (Thursday, 8 September)

Bart van Leeuwen

Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Tuesday, 20 September)

Dimitris Kontokostas

Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
Recursion (ISSUE-22) (Sunday, 25 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Friday, 9 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 September 2016 (Wednesday, 7 September)
Re: ISSUE-71 (Wednesday, 7 September)
Re: ISSUE-71 (was: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph) (Tuesday, 6 September)

Holger Knublauch

Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: Test cases framework (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: Test cases framework (Thursday, 29 September)
Re: About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org (Wednesday, 28 September)
Re: Test cases framework (Tuesday, 27 September)
Public mailing list (Tuesday, 27 September)
ISSUE-131: We could drop the shapesGraph argument from sh:hasShape (Monday, 26 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-155 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 23 September)
ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close (Friday, 23 September)
Editorial ISSUES that can be closed IMHO (Thursday, 22 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-178 (sh:message constraints): Should sh:message be permitted at constraints, too? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 22 September)
Re: SHACL draft renumbered? (Wednesday, 21 September)
ISSUE-105: Updated proposal with sh:prefixes (Thursday, 15 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Thursday, 15 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Tuesday, 13 September)
Re: ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Sunday, 11 September)
ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape (Friday, 9 September)
Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (Thursday, 8 September)
Meeting times (was: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016) (Thursday, 8 September)
SHACL Full (Thursday, 8 September)
Re: ISSUE-71 (Tuesday, 6 September)
ISSUE-71 (was: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph) (Tuesday, 6 September)
Test cases framework (Monday, 5 September)
Re: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph (Sunday, 4 September)
ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (Thursday, 1 September)
ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph (Thursday, 1 September)

Irene Polikoff

Re: Meeting times (was: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016) (Thursday, 8 September)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

Re: Test cases framework (Thursday, 29 September)

Karen Coyle

Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Friday, 30 September)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 30 September)
Wiki page to keep track of current comments (Wednesday, 28 September)
Re: Public mailing list (Wednesday, 28 September)
Re: Editorial ISSUES that can be closed IMHO (Friday, 23 September)
ISSUE-163 is done (Wednesday, 21 September)
SHACL draft renumbered? (Wednesday, 21 September)
Re: Weekly call schedule (Wednesday, 14 September)
Issues 71 & 137 (Wednesday, 7 September)
Re: ISSUE-71 (Tuesday, 6 September)
Re: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph (Monday, 5 September)
Re: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph (Sunday, 4 September)
Re: shapes-ACTION-41: Create some wiki documentation exploring the requirements (Saturday, 3 September)

mark

Re: Test cases framework (Tuesday, 27 September)

markh

Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (Thursday, 8 September)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0 (Thursday, 29 September)
shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 29 September)
shapes-ISSUE-180 (Path bnodes): Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)
shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific terminology issues as needed (Tuesday, 27 September)
shapes-ISSUE-179 (label annotations): Should SHACL include a mechanism to specify display labels? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 22 September)
shapes-ISSUE-178 (sh:message constraints): Should sh:message be permitted at constraints, too? [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 21 September)
shapes-ISSUE-177 (abstract-syntax-disconnected): Abstract Syntax is disconnected from concrete syntax (Wednesday, 7 September)
shapes-ACTION-42: Document library use cases for (remote) validation protocol (Thursday, 1 September)
shapes-ACTION-41: Create some wiki documentation exploring the requirements (Thursday, 1 September)

Simon Steyskal

Re: Public mailing list (Thursday, 29 September)
ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 29 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 15:52:27 UTC