Re: SHACL Full

I think that's reasonable.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud




From:   Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
To:     "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Date:   09/08/2016 04:53 AM
Subject:        SHACL Full



We have different terms to speak about the non-Core features of SHACL. 
Among others, they are labeled "advanced features" or "extension 
mechanisms". Neither of them are sufficient to cover what these features 
really are about. We do have the established term "SHACL Core", so I 
suggest we call the language consisting of SHACL Core plus these other 
features simply "SHACL Full". This is similar to how OWL 1 is defined.

I have made corresponding edits to the spec, including definitions in 
the Terminology section. Please let me know if anyone has concerns with 
this approach.

Thanks,
Holger