public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from July 2016 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: $variables (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: $variables (Monday, 11 July)
• Fwd: Re: Improving EXISTS (Friday, 1 July)

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 July 2016 (Friday, 29 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 July 2016 (Wednesday, 27 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 21 July 2016 (Friday, 22 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 July 2016 (Thursday, 21 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 July 2016 (Friday, 15 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 July 2016 (Thursday, 14 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 July 2016 (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: $variables (Saturday, 9 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 July 2016 (Thursday, 7 July)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 30 June 2016 (Friday, 1 July)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 28 July)
• ISSUE-150: nested severities (Thursday, 28 July)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-134 (Does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints)_ (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: ISSUE-139: Compromise (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: $variables (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 28 July)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 July 2016 (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Monday, 18 July)
• ISSUE-139: Compromise (Monday, 18 July)
• ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs (Thursday, 14 July)
• List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: $variables (Saturday, 9 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-158 (ill-typed literals and sh:datatype): ill-typed literals do not always trigger a validation result [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: $variables (Thursday, 7 July)
• Categorization of constraint components (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (Thursday, 7 July)
• ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (Wednesday, 6 July)
• ISSUE-65 and ISSUE-111: Could IMHO be closed (Wednesday, 6 July)
• ISSUE-132: Can be closed (Wednesday, 6 July)
• ISSUE-41: Progress (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-171 (negated sh:classIn): sh:classIn SPARQL definition incorrect [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: abstract syntax for SHACL (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: question on sh:NodeConstraint (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: abstract syntax for SHACL (Sunday, 3 July)

Iovka Boneva

• question on sh:NodeConstraint (Friday, 1 July)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)

Karen Coyle

• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 28 July)
• Updates to Abstract Syntax (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples (Saturday, 16 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: $variables (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: $variables (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: $variables (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: $variables (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: $variables (Saturday, 9 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: $variables (Thursday, 7 July)
• $variables (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: abstract syntax for SHACL (Sunday, 3 July)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 1 July)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-175 (scope naming): Alternate naming for term for scope / in-scope [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 22 July)
• shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] (Monday, 11 July)
• shapes-ISSUE-173 (Hiding SPARQL): [Editorial] Text related to SPARQL definitions needs to be hidden together with query [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 8 July)

Last message date: Friday, 29 July 2016 16:31:37 UTC