public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from June 2015 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 25 June 2015 (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 18 June 2015 (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: bypassing the WebEx insane web interface (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: zakim and webex and attendance (Thursday, 11 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 June 2015 (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 June 2015 (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 June 2015 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: editing SHACL specification document or fragment (Wednesday, 3 June)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics with negated recursion (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-71 (Protocol): SHACL Endpoint Protocol [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 18 June 2015 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Core SHACL Semantics: Probable Typos (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Core SHACL Semantics: Inference Rules (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Core SHACL Semantics - More Abstract Syntax Questions/Comments (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Core SHACL Semantics: SImple vs Complex Shapes (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Core SHACL Semantics - More Abstract Syntax Questions/Comments (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Core SHACL Semantics - Abstract Syntax Bugs (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: SHACL Specification Fragment (ACTION-27) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: bypassing the WebEx insane web interface (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-64 (XSD Datatype facets): Should the Core vocabulary support datatype facets such as sh:minInclusive and sh:maxLength? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-52 (labra): Define an Abstract Syntax for SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 June 2015 (Wednesday, 3 June)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-47 - no required access to the shape graph (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Friday, 5 June)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• new use cases for clinical data (multi-occurance) and OneOf (Wednesday, 3 June)

Holger Knublauch

• TopBraid Composer 5.0 beta with SHACL support (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-70 (blank node default type): special treatment of blank node types [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Friday, 19 June)
• SHACL: A language for multiple platforms (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-47 - no required access to the shape graph (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-6 - status of scopes on shapes and constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: SHACL Specification Fragment (ACTION-27) (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 11 June)
• ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-66 (ill-founded): SHACL should not be ill-founded [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger) (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 4 June)
• [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-65 (shapes, scopes, and constraints): A consistent and cohesive definition of shapes, scopes, and constraints [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [an aside on JavaScript] Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: implementing today's resolution (Monday, 1 June)
• [Editorial] Issues/Home page cleaned up (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: implementing today's resolution (Monday, 1 June)

Iovka Boneva

• F2F4 Venue information (Thursday, 18 June)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)

Karen Coyle

• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics with negated recursion (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Specific proposals for ISSUE-1 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics with negated recursion (Wednesday, 24 June)
• proposal for ISSUE-47 - no required access to the shape graph (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Thursday, 18 June)
• ISSUE-6 - status of scopes on shapes and constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: bypassing the WebEx insane web interface (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Thursday, 11 June)
• zakim and webex and attendance (Thursday, 11 June)
• bypassing the WebEx insane web interface (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: a path towards implementing the way forward (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Wednesday, 10 June)
• SHACL Specification Fragment (ACTION-27) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Monday, 8 June)
• on shape recognition (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 4 June)
• on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Thursday, 4 June)
• on constraints (ISSUE-65) (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 4 June)
• tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: editing SHACL specification document or fragment (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• [an aside on JavaScript] Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62) (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: implementing today's resolution (Monday, 1 June)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-72 (QCRs): Qualified Cardinality Restrictions [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 25 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-71 (Protocol): SHACL Endpoint Protocol [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 19 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-70 (blank node default type): special treatment of blank node types [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 19 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-69 (rdf:langString): status of rdf:langString values with xsd:string datatype [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 19 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-68 (pre-binding): pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 12 June)
• ISSUE-67: Http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/66 (Thursday, 11 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-66 (ill-founded): SHACL should not be ill-founded [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 June)
• shapes-ACTION-27: Write outline of semantics document fragment (Thursday, 4 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-65 (shapes, scopes, and constraints): A consistent and cohesive definition of shapes, scopes, and constraints [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-64 (XSD Datatype facets): Should the Core vocabulary support datatype facets such as sh:minInclusive and sh:maxLength? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)
• shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 1 June)

Simon Steyskal

• Regrets for 25.06.2015 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape (Thursday, 11 June)

Tom Johnson

• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: [ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope (Thursday, 4 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 23:56:15 UTC