public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from June 2015 by subject

[an aside on JavaScript] Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec]

[Editorial] Issues/Home page cleaned up

[ISSUE-62] A clean proposal with sh:Scope

a path towards implementing the way forward

bypassing the WebEx insane web interface

Core SHACL Semantics - Abstract Syntax Bugs

Core SHACL Semantics - More Abstract Syntax Questions/Comments

Core SHACL Semantics: Inference Rules

Core SHACL Semantics: Probable Typos

Core SHACL Semantics: SImple vs Complex Shapes

editing SHACL specification document or fragment

F2F4 Venue information

http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics with negated recursion

implementing today's resolution

ISSUE-22: Proposal based on sh:hasShape

ISSUE-6 - status of scopes on shapes and constraints

ISSUE-67: Http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/66

new use cases for clinical data (multi-occurance) and OneOf

on constraints (ISSUE-65)

on shape recognition

Proposal for ISSUE-1

proposal for ISSUE-47 - no required access to the shape graph

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 18 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 25 June 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 June 2015

Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages

Regrets for 25.06.2015

resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?

SHACL Specification Fragment (ACTION-27)

SHACL: A language for multiple platforms

shapes-ACTION-26: Draft a proposal for issue-1 (with holger)

shapes-ACTION-27: Write outline of semantics document fragment

shapes-ISSUE-52 (labra): Define an Abstract Syntax for SHACL [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-63 (sh:hasShape): Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-64 (XSD Datatype facets): Should the Core vocabulary support datatype facets such as sh:minInclusive and sh:maxLength? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-65 (shapes, scopes, and constraints): A consistent and cohesive definition of shapes, scopes, and constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-66 (ill-founded): SHACL should not be ill-founded [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-68 (pre-binding): pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-69 (rdf:langString): status of rdf:langString values with xsd:string datatype [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-70 (blank node default type): special treatment of blank node types [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-71 (Protocol): SHACL Endpoint Protocol [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-72 (QCRs): Qualified Cardinality Restrictions [SHACL Spec]

Specific proposals for ISSUE-1

TopBraid Composer 5.0 beta with SHACL support

tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list

update to SHACL-SPARQL (ISSUE-62)

Using sh:scopeShape within And/Xor/Not/OR Constraints

zakim and webex and attendance

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 23:56:15 UTC