- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:52:05 -0700
- To: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Which limited forms of recursion do you mean? Where are these limited forms useful (and better than other approaches)? peter On 06/10/2015 04:11 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote: > Catching up. > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >> - - No recursive shapes. > > -1 > > I think prohibiting recursion is unnecessary. Certain limited forms of > recursion are useful and well-defined. > > -- Arthur > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVeM2lAAoJECjN6+QThfjzHz4H/1cpNq0zuMl44SrklzTlmNh8 9pl2GhfqZ7vsmdihhjit3PY0qC44knLWgzx4ZqakOxe/l1evtJX5tGeSXv5Bw1Vn S6rGD8RfT4/TcZJ4QHqd3PNfmGGUCbtLoXcQuhSFPkwWtrwvA4+475lKMAiY6Mvp EgJAmrFdBmh9VAEjx2Lcu3z25+4mkJ3s7TpHmNeWLaIrKBOnPiDPG9JylZe/XLtk zPyFU0aGdWJtUKlJyhluKlLiulGoACNLhrNrZ/pbDah5udzZDcbs3qn9ToWO1OsR cyKV0nZGumfmJXBRgD0JsGq7At8kahHSQ+6YFOqC16LCzao2Uelbdbe1qiQZy5w= =2Wyv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 23:52:37 UTC