W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Regrets for this week's call

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:38:04 +0200
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <76C53BD2-1EC2-428A-AC0A-53393E885374@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>

> On 23 Jun 2015, at 17:06 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
> 

<skip>

> We also need to approve the tests.
> 
> Regarding .well-known, it seems unlikely that the TAG will officially change it’s position, and I don’t think that much else has changed.

Yes. I must say I am really worried that this discussion will drag on indefinitely. I must admit that the flexibility offered by .well-known is also appealing to me, which is an argument that did not come up on the TAG list (but I do not want to interfere). There is a point when we have to make a decision…

> @mot suggested adding some wording about caching of .well-known/csvm in the absence of specific caching instructions.
> 
> I went through the change log and updated metadata & model document change sections as I thought appropriate.
> 

Wow. Thanks.

Ivan


> Gregg
> 
>> As a further difficulty, this is a LCCR. This means we have to do some admin: we have to find the time to get a telco set up with Philippe and Ralph, plus at the minimum Jeni, Danbri, and I, but preferably Gregg and Jeremy, too. W3M has a F2F meeting July 1-3; I guess the earliest time we can reasonably schedule something may be the week of the 6th of July with the hope to publish on the 14th, and also have a charter extension accepted on the 15th. Hm… I plan to be on vacations some day and I thought of going away on the 13th, this may go down the drain:-(
>> 
>> Bottom line: we have to do some serious planning. I think that if this is not done on the week of the 6th, we might as well postpone until after the vacations. The caveat is that if we do not have LCCR, and with a very low activity in the group (meaning that the activity is reduced the five of us) it will not be easy to get the W3M approval for an extension (though probably doable).
>> 
>> Of course, this can be done by email.
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> P.S. B.t.w., although this is not urgent we will also have to decide on the extension length. I would propose to ask for more than we feel we need, taking into account Hofstadter's Law[1]. Asking for a 2nd extension is much tougher, and we may be forced to close the work by issuing some WG notes and dismantling the group… I would hate if that happened.
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter%27s_law
>> 
>>> 
>>> Dan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jeni
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 15:38:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 23 June 2015 15:38:15 UTC