W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Should we have a 29-04-2015 CSVW call tomorrow?

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:15:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CADtUq_1LXdkR9X4gRY2MaomTkaqm_P8ZRvtr2gJeukGdubLewA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
I have time for a short experiment. Would be interested to hear about
experience / plans for other implementations. (sadly I have none- but am
trying to use the CSVW specs with real data, hence my somewhat complicated
rdf data cube example [1]).

Wonder if it's worth experimenting with Glitter [2] too for IM? (albeit
that would make the capture of minutes harder tomorrow)

Jeremy

[1]:
https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/examples/rdf-data-cube-example.md
[2]: https://gitter.im/w3c/csvw

On 28 April 2015 at 16:04, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues has nothing flagged as requiring
> teleconf time, and only 3 editor actions outstanding:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Editor+action%22
>
> #508 Comments on registration template for "application/csvm+json"
> #505 Specify that 'source number' begins by 1 Editor action For LCCR
> Model Document
> #481 Add changes since last WD
>
> Is there appetite or need for a CSVW call tomorrow?
>
> Ivan has also mentioned recently that there is an issue facing up
> w.r.t. the coming shutdown of Zakim, and suggests we experiment soon
> with WebEx as a possible replacement teleconf option. Ivan - is it too
> late to try this for tomorrow? Could we perhaps set up a parallel call
> and drop back to Zakim if any attendee (who reports problems via
> IRC/mail) can't get WebEx working?
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 15:15:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 28 April 2015 15:15:59 UTC