Re: Should we have a 29-04-2015 CSVW call tomorrow?

> On 28 Apr 2015, at 17:15 , Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have time for a short experiment. Would be interested to hear about experience / plans for other implementations. (sadly I have none- but am trying to use the CSVW specs with real data, hence my somewhat complicated rdf data cube example [1]).
> 
> Wonder if it's worth experimenting with Glitter [2] too for IM? (albeit that would make the capture of minutes harder tomorrow)

Eventually, yes; but I would propose to concentrate on one issue at a time… And the demise of zakim is close:-(

Ivan

> 
> Jeremy
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/examples/rdf-data-cube-example.md
> [2]: https://gitter.im/w3c/csvw
> 
> On 28 April 2015 at 16:04, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues has nothing flagged as requiring
> teleconf time, and only 3 editor actions outstanding:
> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Editor+action%22
> 
> #508 Comments on registration template for "application/csvm+json"
> #505 Specify that 'source number' begins by 1 Editor action For LCCR
> Model Document
> #481 Add changes since last WD
> 
> Is there appetite or need for a CSVW call tomorrow?
> 
> Ivan has also mentioned recently that there is an issue facing up
> w.r.t. the coming shutdown of Zakim, and suggests we experiment soon
> with WebEx as a possible replacement teleconf option. Ivan - is it too
> late to try this for tomorrow? Could we perhaps set up a parallel call
> and drop back to Zakim if any attendee (who reports problems via
> IRC/mail) can't get WebEx working?
> 
> Dan
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704