W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > December 2018

Re: The United Humans investment offer

From: Sam Chase <samantha@venn.agency>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:24:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFjjKzm6gOxmE_R08vjQ-jV9o3zNB_-JC7eA-CY3z2q3TYGgyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bohdan Andriyiv <bohdan.andriyiv@validbook.org>
Cc: Greg Kidd <gregkidd@gmail.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
I appreciate your passion but am not interested in sharing any more of my
time with you.


*Sam Chase**-------------------------------------------------------*
*Founder, Venn.Agency*
*The Intelligent Edge*
*Phone:* 323-740-9425  Linkedin
*-------------------------------------------------------*
*samantha@venn.agency <samantha@venn.agency>*


On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:23 AM Bohdan Andriyiv <
bohdan.andriyiv@validbook.org> wrote:

> Sam, I am not saying my project is better than others. Let a thousand
> flowers bloom! I would be happy to know about other projects and discuss
> them.
>
> What I am saying is "I have a great idea - to build The United Humans
> organization, similarly as we have The United Nations organization. Here is
> the short description of how it can be funded and what can be its purpose -
> to build a set of core cooperation tools. Here is POC. Here is development
> roadmap. Join me!".  So far, in reply I hear something like – "Why don't
> you join more mature foundations to do this, they are doing something
> similar." I have wrote here the reasons why this way of starting The United
> Humans organization is not desirable -
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2018Dec/0073.html
>
> >There are about a thousand steps that need to happen before your
> initiative is even possible.
> Although, this project has global vision, it can be started small. You do
> not need thousands step to start it. You can just build it. The POC is
> done.  I'd rather discuss POC and central points that make The United
> Humans possible (graph analysis of web of claims about unique
> representation of human individuals; long term funding of UH; Kudos
> distribution, etc.). It would be much more productive.
>
> Anyway Sam, thank you for taking part in the conversation about The United
> Humans idea. It is still valuable! I will be happy to reply to other
> critique.
>
> -Bohdan
>
>  ---- On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:12:36 +0200 Sam Chase <samantha@venn.agency>
> wrote ----
>  > Your answer read as “yes but my way is better.” There are about a
> thousand steps that need to happen before your initiative is even possible.
> We as a group are doing the things needed collaboratively to grow this
> standard. You starting something that is completely your vision and then
> asking everyone (WHO ALSO HAVE PROJECTS, and don’t blast the entire group
> about them asking for money) to support you.
>  >
>  > Sent from my iPhone
>  >
>  > > On Dec 18, 2018, at 11:03 AM, Bohdan Andriyiv <
> bohdan.andriyiv@validbook.org> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > it
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:25:33 UTC