W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Agenda for January 10 VCTF meeting

From: Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:43:42 -0800
Message-Id: <1483771422.2127634.840076769.08ABA8EE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, "Varn, Richard J" <rvarn@ets.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "=Drummond Reed" <drummond@respect.network>, Les Chasen <les@respect.network>, Bob Burke <bburke@kou.pn>, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>






On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:

> Tim,

> 

> The use cases we'll be discussing are at
> https://opencreds.github.io/vc-use-cases/
> 

> Please suggest improvements or ask questions via the issues list at
> https://github.com/opencreds/vc-use-cases/issues
> 

> I'll have some proposals for additions/improvements to the Needs Map
> and there are already twenty issues to consider, ranging from simple
> grammar to terminology shifts and additional content.
> 

> The more we can discuss via github issues, the easier it will be to
> address your concerns about time on the call.
> 

> -j

> 

> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 02:32 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote:

>> Maybe also basic math skills tutorial?



>> The allotted time (perusal) is 1 hour, and someone is leading the
>> schedule into a format that seems to imply use of some unknown
>> compression format.
>> We use standards here I thought?  Time being one of them.



>> Best wishes for 2017.  I suggest if the agenda items do not fit into
>> the allotted time (ie 1 hour schedule with specified tasks and
>> allotted time) its disingenuous to list it. (To a running sheet that
>> says you need 1:50).
>> Unless some sort of other statement is implied, that is less clear?
>> If people believe they'll be running the broader agenda, with an
>> array of "lockout modalities", I expect a graph / ontological
>> response is amongst the most likely  outcomes. (If, like the
>> compression algorithm used in your proposed agenda that does not make
>> sense, let me know.  Happy to outline it.).
>> Finally, please supply the modern usecases being reviewed.  They've
>> been stripped in past, simplified, and I believe the dignity/privacy
>> related considerations less than clear as part of former text
>> redactions. It's important people know what their voting for.
>> Tim.h.



>> 

>> On Sat., 7 Jan. 2017, 8:21 am Varn, Richard J, <rvarn@ets.org> wrote:
>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2017____



>>> Time: 11am ET, UTC -5____



>>> Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf____



>>>            irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf____



>>> Voice: sip:vctf@96.89.14.196[1]____



>>>        tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 (extension 6306)____



>>> Duration: 60 minutes____



>>> Scribes: DanB, NateO, KerriL, MatthewL, CarlaC, StuartS, MattS,
>>> GreggK, ShaneM, Longley, ChristopherA, Manu, DavidE, LesC, RichardV,
>>> BrianS,____
>>> __ __



>>> Proposed Agenda____



>>> ---------------____



>>> 0. Agenda review and Introductions (5 mins)____



>>> 1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is open - Vote! (5 mins)____



>>> 2. Use Case Review (50 mins)____



>>> ----The Line---- (if time permits after the above)____



>>> 3. Use of WebIDL in spec [1] (20 min target)____



>>> 4. Privacy Section Discussion [2] (10 min intro)____



>>> 5. Part II of the GitHub tutorial (20 mins)____



>>> __ __



>>> [1]https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4____



>>> [2]  https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues____



>>> __ __



>>> Please let us know if there are any other items to consider at the
>>> next meeting or subsequent meetings.____
>>> __ __



>>> __ __



>>> __ __



>>> __ __



>>> 

>>> 

>>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
>>> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual
>>> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you
>>> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not
>>> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the
>>> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any
>>> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>>> 

>>> Thank you for your compliance.



>>> 

> 

> --

> Joe Andrieu, PMP

> joe@andrieu.net

> +1(805)705-8651

> http://blog.joeandrieu.com

> 



--

Joe Andrieu, PMP

joe@joeandrieu.com

+1(805)705-8651

http://blog.joeandrieu.com


Links:

  1. mailto:sip%3Avctf@96.89.14.196
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 06:44:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:33 UTC