W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Agenda for January 10 VCTF meeting

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:32:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok23hLnGCUS4fGQJ5VvTdFeFNw9=t0siFKUsjSFG8qXR8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Varn, Richard J" <rvarn@ets.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "=Drummond Reed" <drummond@respect.network>, Les Chasen <les@respect.network>, Joe Andrieu <joe@andrieu.net>, Bob Burke <bburke@kou.pn>, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Maybe also basic math skills tutorial?

The allotted time (perusal) is 1 hour, and someone is leading the schedule
into a format that seems to imply use of some unknown compression format.

We use standards here I thought?  Time being one of them.

Best wishes for 2017.  I suggest if the agenda items do not fit into the
allotted time (ie 1 hour schedule with specified tasks and allotted time)
its disingenuous to list it. (To a running sheet that says you need 1:50).

Unless some sort of other statement is implied, that is less clear?

If people believe they'll be running the broader agenda, with an array of
"lockout modalities", I expect a graph / ontological response is amongst
the most likely  outcomes. (If, like the compression algorithm used in your
proposed agenda that does not make sense, let me know.  Happy to outline
it.).

Finally, please supply the modern usecases being reviewed.  They've been
stripped in past, simplified, and I believe the dignity/privacy related
considerations less than clear as part of former text redactions. It's
important people know what their voting for.

Tim.h.

On Sat., 7 Jan. 2017, 8:21 am Varn, Richard J, <rvarn@ets.org> wrote:

> Tuesday, January 10, 2017
>
> Time: 11am ET, UTC -5
>
> Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf
>
>            irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf
>
> Voice: sip:vctf@96.89.14.196
>
>        tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 <+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306> (extension
> 6306)
>
> Duration: 60 minutes
>
> Scribes: DanB, NateO, KerriL, MatthewL, CarlaC, StuartS, MattS, GreggK,
> ShaneM, Longley, ChristopherA, Manu, DavidE, LesC, RichardV, BrianS,
>
>
>
> Proposed Agenda
>
> ---------------
>
> 0. Agenda review and Introductions (5 mins)
>
> 1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is open - Vote! (5 mins)
>
> 2. Use Case Review (50 mins)
>
> ----The Line---- (if time permits after the above)
>
> 3. Use of WebIDL in spec [1] (20 min target)
>
> 4. Privacy Section Discussion [2] (10 min intro)
>
> 5. Part II of the GitHub tutorial (20 mins)
>
>
>
> [1]https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4
>
> [2] https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues
>
>
>
> Please let us know if there are any other items to consider at the next
> meeting or subsequent meetings.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>
Received on Friday, 6 January 2017 22:33:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:33 UTC