- From: Manrique Lopez <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:29:42 +0200
- To: Alan Chuter <achuter.technosite@yahoo.com>
- Cc: mobileOK Pro <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>
El 09/04/2008, a las 10:47, Alan Chuter escribió: > > ** 4.36 Testing > The BP doesn't mention validation. I think you could > have invalid markup and then use emulators and real > devices to test in many ways with no problem (without > stumbling upon the hypothetical problem). So > validation isn't required here, I think. I really > strongly suggest that there be no test for this BP. Should the page be "validated" as mobileOK Basic to get mobileOK Pro? Perhaps, the 'tester' should inform which devices (included DDC, and perhaps ADC) were used for testing, so things like 4.25 could be repeatable by others. I mean, test for 4.25 (PAGE SIZE USABLE): "For every device used for 4.36 (TESTING), if a given web page contains contiguous content, which could technically and semantically be separated into individual pages, and exceeds 3 screen sizes in length without page break [FAIL]" For TESTING, devices could be defined 'agnostic', I mean, defined by their capabilities. Should TESTING tests indicate the number of devices to test with? Best regards, --- José Manrique López de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org> Área de Tecnología Fundación CTIC Web: http://www.fundacionctic.org Tel: (+34) 984 29 12 12 Parque Científico Tecnológico de Gijón Edificio Centros Tecnológicos Cabueñes s/n 33203 GIJÓN - ASTURIAS - ESPAÑA P Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 09:30:57 UTC