W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-pro@w3.org > April 2008

RE: Missed phone conference

From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:55:54 +0200
Message-ID: <398533C370C23441981074C456AA3BDD031DB276@QEO00226.de.t-online.corp>
To: "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>

Hi,

I'd be for that.

Question, also in view of your reworked tests and the feedback given:
How do we capture worthwhile suggestions and how do we decide to
implement them?

Kai 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-pro-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-bpwg-pro-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phil Archer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:23 AM
> To: public-bpwg-pro@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Missed phone conference
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich wrote:
> [..]
> >  
> >  
> > Shall we cancel the call until there is a clear need and 
> schedule at 
> > this time upon demand?
> >  
> > I would prefer that.
> 
> We can do that as long as:
> 
> 1. The list continues to be active and we can show progress 
> with the document (which we can this week, for example) 2. 
> We're not giving more ammunition to those who think we're all 
> wasting our time anyway.
> 
> Having action items (with deadlines) helps concentrate the mind.
> 
> How about this as a next batch of action items for us all:
> 
> 1. Someone does Dan's tests (4.27 - 4.31). With the greatest 
> of respect and personal liking for Mr Appelquist, I know he 
> won't mind me saying that he's crap at doing his action items.
> 
> 2. We each now review a batch of tests that someone else did 
> (including any e-mail comments they may have made ;-)) Where 
> things need actual resolutions - such resolutions can be 
> posted to the list.
> 
> 3. Let's see if we can work towards having a version of the 
> doc sans-issues and editorial notes within a given time frame.
> 
> P
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 14:56:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 April 2008 14:56:39 GMT