W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: HOMEWORK: Review Use-Cases & Requirements Doc for Mon

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:12:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4F368543.2020900@w3.org>
To: Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>, Olivier lliboutry <liberty@club-internet.fr>
CC: public-audio@w3.org
There are two more UC candidate I was thinking about for musicians.

The first one is a metronome. Basically it gives the tempo.
The beat can be changed to different speed intervals (moderato, allegro 
presto, etc.).
The accent can also be changed to tempo ( 2, 3 , 4,  etc.)
The sound can also the changes (drum, bongo, clap, etc;)
Output of the metronome can be done with visual indicators and auditory 
means.


Another UC would be a real-time Tuner for a range of instruments like 
guitar, flute, saxophone, violin, etc.
It inputs the sound of the instrument through the mic (or inline for 
electric instrument) and analyzes the frequency and shows whether your 
instrument is tuned accurately. This scenario probably involves 
MediaStream Capture.


Thierry


Le 09/02/2012 23:31, Alistair MacDonald a écrit :
> We discussed creating a list of priorities for the Use-Cases&
> Requirements during the last telecon.
>
> Please take some time to read through the UC&  Reqs. document, as we
> will be discussing this on Monday.
> (It took me 21mins to read through at a relaxed pace.)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements
>
> If you notice something small that needs fixing, typos, etc... do fix.
>
> The UC&  Reqs. document is bulking out quickly, so if you feel the
> need to add, replace or remove large chunks of text at this stage,
> (and you have not specifically been tasked to do so), please take
> notes and bring your ideas to the mailing list for discussion.
>
> Thanks!
>
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2012 15:12:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 February 2012 15:12:27 GMT