W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:23:48 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55168.1360178628@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In message <CABP7Rbdv-zuAg3=O6oHRqJY0=xBYsBZ7kQpV0cqjePjk3+O2EA@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>flow (honestly, I think allowing 32-bit
>length control frames is just asking for trouble by encouraging bad

The important thing is that you have to announce your bad behaviour
up front, that makes it very easy to deal with it on the receiving end.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:24:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:10 UTC