W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:23:48 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55168.1360178628@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
--------
In message <CABP7Rbdv-zuAg3=O6oHRqJY0=xBYsBZ7kQpV0cqjePjk3+O2EA@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>flow (honestly, I think allowing 32-bit
>length control frames is just asking for trouble by encouraging bad
>behavior).

The important thing is that you have to announce your bad behaviour
up front, that makes it very easy to deal with it on the receiving end.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:24:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:24:13 GMT