W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Framing and control-frame continuations

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:11:06 +0100
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <iia5h817cjvpju80vftc1no09lbsjs20n5@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Roberto Peon wrote:
>The idea of a 16 bit field is that it is small enough to require
>implementors to get the continuation case correct because it is will occur
>infrequently, as opposed to larger values where implementations are likely
>to skimp and/or suffer from backup-generator style problems where the
>codepath is exercised so rarely that bugs in it are not found and fixed.
>Additionally, with a 16bit field a naive implementation is more likely not
>to completely screw things up w.r.t. allowing interleaving in response to
>new requests or streams.

(I rather agree with the reasoning here, but 16 bit is a bit small...)
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:11:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:11:34 GMT