W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:14:03 +0100
Message-ID: <510222AB.1070400@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-01-25 00:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Removing the text does seem like the most expedient path forward.
>
> That said, I don't find it particularly satisfying; our job is to improve interop, and when there are latent semantics that aren't documented, we have to consider whether we're doing it well.
>
> I propose:
>
> """
> Note that some recipients treat language tags that have the same quality values (including when they are both missing) to be listed in descending order of priority. However, this behaviour cannot be relied upon, and if their relative priority is important, it ought to be communicated by using different quality values.
> """
>
> ... because I think it best captures where we're at.
>
> Roy and Julian? And, especially, anyone else?

That works for me.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 06:14:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 January 2013 06:14:36 GMT