W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:16:27 +0100
Message-ID: <5102233B.10502@gmx.de>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-01-25 06:31, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2013/01/25 8:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Removing the text does seem like the most expedient path forward.
>> That said, I don't find it particularly satisfying; our job is to
>> improve interop, and when there are latent semantics that aren't
>> documented, we have to consider whether we're doing it well.
>> I propose:
>> """
>> Note that some recipients treat language tags that have the same
>> quality values (including when they are both missing) to be listed in
>> descending order of priority. However, this behaviour cannot be relied
>> upon, and if their relative priority is important, it ought to be
>> communicated by using different quality values.
>> """
>> ... because I think it best captures where we're at.
> Maybe I'm getting this wrong, but it sounds to me that Julian is
> insisting that it's okay to send arbitrary replies (e.g. once French,
> once English at random) if there are no q-values. It has been very

It is, according to the spec. If it hurts, don't do it (thus add qvalues).

> clearly explained that this is highly confusing (in other words, bad for
> interoperability). Even if the current spec allows this, it would be
> good to have some text in the new spec that says that's a bad idea.

We could also say that leaving the choice to the server might lead to 
different languages being picked in subsequent requests.

> Otherwise, I'm fine with the above Note, except for a small nit:
> Please change "including when they are both missing" to "including when
> they are missing", because there may be more than two missing (or equal)
> q-values.
> Regards,   Martin.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 06:17:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC