Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"

Hopefully within the week; we have very little left to do:
  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/20


On 25/01/2013, at 4:29 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 25/01/2013 4:56 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2013-01-24 16:51, Zhong Yu wrote:
>>>     Either a Content-Range ... or a multipart/byteranges Content-Type
>>> 
>>> This does not clearly define a precedence; maybe we should clarify
>>> what if both exist.
>>> 
>>> And other conflicting texts:
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21#section-4.1
>> 
>> Stop looking at draft 21; it's seriously outdated. -> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki>
> 
> Speaking of which what timeframe can we expect a -22 ?
> Some of us implementing need to be able to point at a reference Draft at least.
> 
> Amos
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 05:43:50 UTC