W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable"

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:43:17 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E491A474-B287-4406-890E-59D82192ABBE@mnot.net>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Hopefully within the week; we have very little left to do:
  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/20


On 25/01/2013, at 4:29 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 25/01/2013 4:56 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2013-01-24 16:51, Zhong Yu wrote:
>>>     Either a Content-Range ... or a multipart/byteranges Content-Type
>>> 
>>> This does not clearly define a precedence; maybe we should clarify
>>> what if both exist.
>>> 
>>> And other conflicting texts:
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21#section-4.1
>> 
>> Stop looking at draft 21; it's seriously outdated. -> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki>
> 
> Speaking of which what timeframe can we expect a -22 ?
> Some of us implementing need to be able to point at a reference Draft at least.
> 
> Amos
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 05:43:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 January 2013 05:43:55 GMT