- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:26:32 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-01-24 02:17, Mark Nottingham wrote: > So, does anyone have an issue with making ordering significant when there's no qvalue for *all* headers that use qvalues? > .. I still do, and I'd prefer we go back to what the spec has been saying for well over a decade. What *real* problem are we solving with this change that justifies making current implementations broken? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 08:27:01 UTC