W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:26:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5100F038.6050902@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-01-24 02:17, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> So, does anyone have an issue with making ordering significant when there's no qvalue for *all* headers that use qvalues?
> ..

I still do, and I'd prefer we go back to what the spec has been saying 
for well over a decade.

What *real* problem are we solving with this change that justifies 
making current implementations broken?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 08:27:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC