W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:10:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4F23AD84.1010003@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-01-28 00:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2012, at 7:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> On 2012-01-24 04:55, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>> Please add...
>>
>> - Revise Parts 1 through 7 for publication as Internet Standard
>>
>> This should be mainly fixing problems found past publication, plus adjustments we make to better integrate whatever new we come up with.
>
> My current thinking is that we'd re-charter separately for that.

Hm. Isn't it foreseeable that we'll have to tune P1 more anyway for a 
different on-the-wire format?

>> Re HTTP/next: it would be good to collect a list of things we think we should make progress on; not surprisingly, I'd nominate I18N for header field values.
>
> So, that's an interesting question.
>
> If we want HTTP/1.1<->  2.0 gateways, and we don't want to force them to know about individual header semantics, that implies that we can't really change header encoding, doesn't it?

Indeed: and I think that's a problem with the plan.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 08:11:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT