W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:12:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4F23ADEC.4010201@gmx.de>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-01-28 01:40, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message<EC463243-A3B0-4E35-BE92-95B35F3DE067@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
> tes:
>
>>> Re HTTP/next: it would be good to collect a list of things we think we =
>> should make progress on; not surprisingly, I'd nominate I18N for header =
>> field values.
>>
>> So, that's an interesting question.
>
> I18N in transport headers:  Forget it, it would kill performance if
> done right, and do nobody any good if not.
> ...

How would saying that it's UTF-8 affect performance?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 08:13:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT