W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:37:33 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EC463243-A3B0-4E35-BE92-95B35F3DE067@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 24/01/2012, at 7:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-01-24 04:55, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> ...
> Please add...
> - Revise Parts 1 through 7 for publication as Internet Standard
> This should be mainly fixing problems found past publication, plus adjustments we make to better integrate whatever new we come up with.

My current thinking is that we'd re-charter separately for that.

> Re HTTP/next: it would be good to collect a list of things we think we should make progress on; not surprisingly, I'd nominate I18N for header field values.

So, that's an interesting question.

If we want HTTP/1.1 <-> 2.0 gateways, and we don't want to force them to know about individual header semantics, that implies that we can't really change header encoding, doesn't it?


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 23:38:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC